<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>KonataChan - told</title>
<link>http://konatachan.net/told</link>
<description>Live RSS feed for http://konatachan.net/told</description>
<language>en</language>';
	<item>
	<title>77</title>
	<link>
			http://konatachan.net/told/res/77.html</link>
	
	<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://konatachan.net/told/src/132675747566.jpg"><img src="http://konatachan.net/told/thumb/132675747566s.jpg" /></a><br /><br />
		
	
			New site!<br /><br />Many files.<br /><br />Link in picture<br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.littlepreteen.com">http://www.littlepreteen.com</a><br /><br />
	
	]]></description>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>76</title>
	<link>
			http://konatachan.net/told/res/55.html#76</link>
	
	<description><![CDATA[
	
			<a href="/told/res/55.html#75" onclick="return highlight('75', true);" class="ref|told|55|75">&gt;&gt;75</a><br />4, actually.<br /><br />
	
	]]></description>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>75</title>
	<link>
			http://konatachan.net/told/res/55.html#75</link>
	
	<description><![CDATA[
	
			I spy 3 of the same grammatical errors.<br /><br />
	
	]]></description>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>69</title>
	<link>
			http://konatachan.net/told/res/55.html#69</link>
	
	<description><![CDATA[
	
			<a href="/told/res/55.html#60" onclick="return highlight('60', true);" class="ref|told|55|60">&gt;&gt;60</a><br />win.<br /><br />
	
	]]></description>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>68</title>
	<link>
			http://konatachan.net/told/res/68.html</link>
	
	<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://konatachan.net/told/src/131917027928.jpg"><img src="http://konatachan.net/told/thumb/131917027928s.jpg" /></a><br /><br />
		
	
			The funny part is this was done before the revealing of Apple&#039;s amazing innovative Siri security approach.<br /><br />
	
	]]></description>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>67</title>
	<link>
			http://konatachan.net/told/res/67.html</link>
	
	<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://konatachan.net/told/src/131787787453.jpg"><img src="http://konatachan.net/told/thumb/131787787453s.jpg" /></a><br /><br />
		
	
	
	]]></description>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>66</title>
	<link>
			http://konatachan.net/told/res/52.html#66</link>
	
	<description><![CDATA[
	
			<a href="/told/res/52.html#63" onclick="return highlight('63', true);" class="ref|told|52|63">&gt;&gt;63</a><br />It&#039;s a repost of a repost of a re-- you get the idea.<br /><br />
	
	]]></description>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>65</title>
	<link>
			http://konatachan.net/told/res/27.html#65</link>
	
	<description><![CDATA[
						[http://konatachan.net/told/src/tdVzboF2E2Q.you] <br /><br />
		
	
			Bumping for great justice.<br /><br />Though I&#039;m wary of the &quot;Anonymous&quot; &quot;Movement&quot; (especially since it started immediately after a bunch of Diggers jumped ship to 4chan), I&#039;ve always hoped that they would attempt a culture jamming campaign aimed at Apple. They&#039;re the business equivalent of Scientology, complete with secret operations and product development, abuse of the judicial system for censorship purposes, batshit endorsements from dubious sources, and the like.<br /><br />Then again, Digg was composed almost entirely of Macfags, so I know that this will never happen. Oh well. At least DoubleTwist is consistently good at trolling the shit out of Apple IRL.<br /><br />
	
	]]></description>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>64</title>
	<link>
			http://konatachan.net/told/res/46.html#64</link>
	
	<description><![CDATA[
	
			Superior to what? Last year&#039;s MacBook Pro?<br /><br />
	
	]]></description>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>63</title>
	<link>
			http://konatachan.net/told/res/52.html#63</link>
	
	<description><![CDATA[
	
			<a href="/told/res/52.html#54" onclick="return highlight('54', true);" class="ref|told|52|54">&gt;&gt;54</a><br /><br />Did you even look at the image? It was posted only yesterday!<br /><br />
	
	]]></description>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>62</title>
	<link>
			http://konatachan.net/told/res/61.html#62</link>
	
	<description><![CDATA[
	
			Welcome to the wonderful world of software patents, where intuition has been copyrighted since 1981.<br /><br />
	
	]]></description>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>61</title>
	<link>
			http://konatachan.net/told/res/61.html</link>
	
	<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://konatachan.net/told/src/131574358466.jpg"><img src="http://konatachan.net/told/thumb/131574358466s.jpg" /></a><br /><br />
		
	
			just want to save this quote i found in one of the comments of this page:<br /><br /><a href="http://appadvice.com/appnn/2011/06/apples-scroll-patent-good-but-not-a-game-changer">http://appadvice.com/appnn/2011/06/apples-scroll-patent-good-but-not-a-game-changer</a><br /><br />i think the poster made a good point. here goes:<br /><br />I think it&#039;s kind of disturbing that a company can patent what is basically the human nature of object interaction. Seriously, how else is a human being suposed to interact with a frame inside of another frame on a multitouch display without effecting the outside frame? Every company in the world can think up that idea on their own without stealing from Apple, because it&#039;s just natural and makes sense. Really what&#039;s next, are other companies going to be forced to create non-natural interfaces (6 finger alien swipes) just because Apple did it the natural way first? And this coming from a huge Appple fan too, I just don&#039;t see how it&#039;s right to put a patent on human interaction.<br /><br />
	
	]]></description>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>60</title>
	<link>
			http://konatachan.net/told/res/55.html#60</link>
	
	<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://konatachan.net/told/src/131572900463.png"><img src="http://konatachan.net/told/thumb/131572900463s.png" /></a><br /><br />
		
	
			fixed<br /><br />
	
	]]></description>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>59</title>
	<link>
			http://konatachan.net/told/res/57.html#59</link>
	
	<description><![CDATA[
	
			its especially funny since samsung actually manufacture the case that apple uses for iphone<br /><br />still, annoys me that apple got away with this. people should get what they want, if a certain design is more desired a company should be able to make it. just because apple has made something slim other companies cant?<br /><br />even if these products are similar in their design its not exactly the same. samsung is just borrowing whats popular. looks like they have been inspired from apple but only a blind man would say that they have copied the design straight of because there are obviously not the same.<br /><br />this is how man should work. stand on the shoulder&#039;s of giants. i mean, firefox has stolen a shitload of stuff (both features and design) from other browsers.<br /><br />is mozilla somehow doing something less wrong than samsung? isn&#039;t it best for humanity if humans are able to get what is desired?<br /><br />
	
	]]></description>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>58</title>
	<link>
			http://konatachan.net/told/res/57.html#58</link>
	
	<description><![CDATA[
	
			Samsung = Copycat<br /><br />
	
	]]></description>
	</item>

</channel>
</rss>

